Saturday 2006/05/20
11:00 AM

Categories: Film, TV

M:I:3

Or, “Alias: The Remix”, as we’ve taken to calling it at home. Apparently we’re not the only ones who think so. I finally got around to watching this last night, and it was a lot of fun. It still doesn’t trump the first one by De Palma, but at least it washes away the bad taste from John Woo’s shameless “Notorious” ripoff.

I know JJ Abrams had his whole “Alias” crew with him (script, set design, music, editing) so it’s not surprising that for better or worse it was like seeing an episode of that show on ‘roids. A bit like comfort food, if you will – the torture fetish, the computer nerd covertly breaking protocol, the mistrust between the field agents and their superiors – it’s all there, and it allowed me to slip into the rhythm of the movie. I would only get pulled out by meta-observations:

“Are we going to cut to a ’48 hours earlier’ title card?” “JJ Abrams finally turned Felicity into a spy. Wasn’t that the joke on how Alias was born?” “Why has Tom Cruise’s acting calcified into a variation on that steely grimace?” “What is going on with Billy Crudup’s hair?” “Hey – it’s Laurence Fishburne! He’s married to Anna Espinosa.” “Ah, Philip Seymour Hoffman. It’s the ‘Magnolia’ reunion!”

Speaking of Philip Seymour Hoffman, it’s nice that he gets to chew it up a bit here, without having to feel like another Oscar depends on it. I was worried that I wouldn’t buy him playing the heavy, but it worked.

I’m also still trying to figure out how I missed Carla Gallo from “Undeclared” – her name was in the credits, but where did she appear?


Responses


Malice of the Highloads

Tuesday 2006/05/23 10:33 AM

Second attempt at a comment up in here. Should I input my SS# and a valid credit card? Do we get Pearl Jam tickets when we leave a comment?

I think that SLATE article is way too harsh on JJ. He’s anything but a hack. (For true hackdom, please see Sir Brett Ratner.) I think ALIAS is his own remake of the M:I tv series so I can’t fault him for using the ALIAS vocabulary to film and M:I movie…

I personally think MI3 is the best of the MI movie lot. Depalma’s had some good ideas, but I don’t think it holds together as a narrative. (Though it’s got some awesome typing sequences — nothing more exciting than watching a big Hollywood superstar emailing intensely for 20 minutes!)

JJ had a good sense of how to tell a story. He does a good job of selling us the idea that Tom Cruise is a human being. Every filmmaker has a unique bag of tricks. You can call Depalma a hack for all his Hitchcock “homages”…

I’ll bet JJ’s going to get the same flack about cribbing from his own tv shows when he mounts “Cast Away 2″…


ds

Tuesday 2006/05/23 11:10 AM

I don’t think one movie can be evidence of hackdom – I’m very interested whatever JJ directs next since it’ll reveal whether these plot devices and images are stylistic tics or whether they were all in service of the story. Regardless, I think M:I:3 worked very well, and in some ways I feel a bit sorry that the Tom Cruise-as-tabloid-fodder angle may have detracted from that.

Perhaps I like the first one in the series so much because it dealt with the deception/trust dynamic of being a spy. That is, you cannot trust anyone – not your mentor or your team. Added to that is the way DePalma plays with the distance between what you see/hear and the truth. I love how he examines that simultaneously via the characters and the audience.

And of course, there’s nothing like a good typing scene to get me going…


Malice Highload

Tuesday 2006/05/23 12:06 PM

I have a soft-spot for typing sequences, too. Lord knows there’s nothing more exciting than watching someone write! We’re sooo cinematic!!!


Leave a Response