Tuesday 2006/06/06
2:58 PM

Categories: Cameras

Sony Drops the A-bomb

Sony finally released details of their first foray into the dslr market after acquiring Konica-Minolta’s business. The ‘Alpha’ A100 keeps the in-body anti-shake of the late Minolta lineup, and adds anti-dust measures as well. The most exciting thing to me is seeing their relationship with Carl Zeiss continued in the lens lineup – although whether we’ll be seeing new designs or just older ones in a new mount remains to be seen.

Still, with a list price scraping $1000 for the Alpha, I’d probably look to Pentax first, with its K100D now outfitted with in-body anti-shake, as well as a nice lineup of pancake primes (21, 40, 70).

That’s if it’s even worth the bother. The problem I have with the current dslr market is that the need for backward compatibility with existing lenses has eliminated a good opportunity to truly break new ground with camera design. I think Olympus is the only company that isn’t hamstrung in some way by the need to support older lenses. Yet even though they’ve demonstrated an ability to think different (live-view slr) they haven’t really capitalized on the opportunity to create smaller, lighter cameras. Their lenses are as big and bulky as their competitors, when we should be going in the other direction. I’m hoping that the Leica-Panasonic partnership in the 4/3rds camp brings something more to the table (some nice, compact zooms or primes would be nice for a change).


Responses


Joseph Llobrera

Wednesday 2006/06/07 12:22 PM

Clearly someone here doesn\\’t have a bag of old film SLR lenses (read: sunk costs) lying around the house. Must belong to that strange breed of photographers: the one year/one camera/one lens/one film shooter =)


ds

Wednesday 2006/06/07 1:08 PM

True about the sunk costs. But even if I did have them lying around, I don’t think it negates the heart of my argument. I actually don’t have anything against legacy support – the fact that you can use an old screwmount lens on a Pentax dslr is a great thing. I would like to see the dslr offerings from companies split into two, however: backwards-compatible bodies, and completely new designs.

I think that if the restrictions imposed by legacy mounts and sensor (read:film) sizes were removed from the equation, then we’d see a lot more innovation. I do think that smaller sensors will have to improve the signal-to-noise ratio for this to happen. But once it does happen (and it will), I think that the possibilities for smaller, lighter lens designs will start to outweigh the singular (albeit very compelling) benefit of being able to use your old bag of lenses.


Leave a Response